Love, Sex, Attraction…and Science

When the perfect woman is genetically male

Posted in news by jenapincott on June 1, 2009

42-20487063Years ago, in college, I met the perfect woman. Or perhaps a man’s idea of the perfect woman. She had flawless and dewy skin, angular cheekbones, a cinched waist, milkmaid breasts, long legs, dove-like hands, lush long hair. Wherever she went, people swiveled their necks and stared. She was a fantasy, a vision. A goddess.

And she was miserable.

It emerged that the source of her pain was a secret that she kept until she enrolled in a radical gender studies class. Inspired, she came to terms with her identity, and in the telling she liberated herself. Her secret was that she wasn’t technically female. She had a condition known as androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS). She was the perfect woman on the outside, and inside she felt perfectly female. But she was genetically male (XY).

Her story was typical for women with complete AIS. At birth her doctors didn’t notice any difference in her genitalia. In high school she went from being a normal girl to an Amazonian queen. She was not only taller than her peers but curvier, too (some androgens are converted to estrogen which act on breast tissue). Unlike other girls, she never got acne or grew pubic or armpit hair (androgens regulate hair growth). She had no body odor. She got recruited as a runway model, was attracted to men and had many boyfriends (including a celebrity), and had sex, albeit painfully. But by age sixteen she didn’t get her period, so her mother brought her to the doctor and an astonishing discovery was made. She had undescended testes. Inside, she appeared male: no fallopian tubes, no uterus, no ovaries.

This gorgeous college student had complete androgen insensitivity syndrome. Women with this condition — approximately 1 in 20,000 — tend to be exceptionally tall and striking in appearance. AIS is caused by a recessive variant of the gene that codes for Androgen Receptor. Because the body is insensitive to the androgen testosterone, the usual male features — penis, testes, scrotum, etc. — are unable to develop. The default phenotype is female, so people with AIS have a vagina or “vaginal pouch” (although most AIS women require surgical expansion). If a woman with AIS were to get a blood test, her testosterone levels would be as high as any man’s, but her body can’t process the hormone. That’s why women with complete AIS are so feminine — arguably more so than other women. (Some people with AIS have only partial androgen insensitivity. Considered intersex, or hermaphrodites, they fall all along the spectrum between typically male and female and have a micropenis. Naturally, there’s much controversy about gender assignment at birth and estrogen or testosterone injections at puberty.)

Several women have revealed they have complete or partial AIS, including singer Eden Atwood and tennis player Sarah Gronert. Although impossible to confirm, several famous celebrities of the past are purported to have had AIS: Wallis Simpson (Edward may have given up the crown for her, but it is said they could never have sexual relations), Queen Elizabeth I, and Joan of Arc. Rumors of AIS abound, perhaps out of jealousy, whenever a celebrity is statuesque, beautiful, and lacking a biological child – Jamie Lee Curtis, Ann Coulter,and even Gisele Bunchen,among many other model types.

In a sense, complete AIS flies in the face of the evolutionary theory I write about in BLONDES. If straight men are drawn to slim waists, shapely breasts, lush scalp hair, sparse body hair, long legs, and flawless skin because those qualities represent high fertility, then AIS is the ultimate deception. As gorgeous as an AIS woman is, there’s no chance of conception. But this ultimately doesn’t matter. It’s the 21st century, and an important lesson must be learned: Femininity is about more than reproduction.

24 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. P.S. said, on June 1, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    Very interesting read, thanks for posting.

  2. Svetllana said, on June 1, 2009 at 10:17 pm

    Такой пост и распечатать не жалко, редко такое найдешь в инете, спасибо!

  3. makes you think « thoughts. said, on June 1, 2009 at 10:17 pm

    [...] 10:17 pm Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: gender, interesting I just read a blog post called When the perfect woman is genetically male. The article talks about androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS). The article describes a beautiful, [...]

  4. smellanizer said, on June 1, 2009 at 10:18 pm

    wow! i love your posts!! this one is yet another interesting read! thanks :)

  5. imsirius said, on June 1, 2009 at 10:44 pm

    Wow. Learn something new every day!

  6. Langit Biru said, on June 1, 2009 at 10:47 pm

    I remeber one episode of ‘House MD’ that the patients have this condition.

  7. Daniel said, on June 1, 2009 at 11:03 pm

    Hopefully in the future, this won’t be a condition that someone will feel they must hide in order to be accepted by their fellow human beings.

    And, I’ll pass this on also:

  8. sunnysideofliving said, on June 1, 2009 at 11:09 pm

    wow…..that was an interesting read…..but scary too……

  9. Rebecca said, on June 1, 2009 at 11:11 pm

    While AIS is definitely interesting (and, as a trans woman, I can’t help but read about women who have AIS with a tinge of jealousy) I don’t know that AIS discounts the theory you put forward in Blondes. That is, if only 1 in 20,000 women have AIS, the overwhelming majority of tall, striking blonds do not. So an evolutionary tendency toward said blondes would still be a net win for the species (assuming the traits do indicate increased fertility and suitability as a mate). Unfortunately, I haven’t had a chance to read your book but, from what you’ve said here and the Amazon description of Blondes, I don’t think AIS would invalidate it at all.

    That said, I do want to draw attention to something you said in the post:

    It emerged that the source of her pain was a secret that she kept until she enrolled in a radical gender studies class. Inspired, she came to terms with her identity, and in the telling she liberated herself. Her secret was that she wasn’t technically female. She had a condition known as androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS). She was the perfect woman on the outside, and inside she felt perfectly female. But she was genetically male (XY).

    I obviously don’t know the woman you’re referencing, but I don’t agree that she wasn’t “technically” female. Defining male and female is a lot more complicated than it seems (as this post acknowledges) and I would argue that there is no such thing as being technically female, because any two people (let alone any two scientists) may have different definitions. Rather, she identified as female and the world accepted her as female – I’d say she was female.

    That isn’t to say I want to discount her struggle to reconcile her genetics with her identity and appearance. Every woman (and every man) has moments of worrying they don’t live up to whatever ideal societal standard of gender exists. And we live in a society that is unkind to those who stray to far from societal norms, and particularly unkind to those perceived to be men “pretending” to be women. It makes perfect sense that someone with AIS would strongly internalize those messages and develop a sense of self-shame.

    But (as you note) gender, femininity, and masculinity, are about much more than what’s between one’s legs.

    (PS – I’m not trying to imply that you don’t or didn’t accept this woman’s identity as female. Rather, I want to note how insidious language can be when speaking about the authenticity of one’s identity, and that words like “technically” can be viewed as qualifiers used with the intent of dismissing another, even if unintentionally.)

    • jenapincott said, on June 3, 2009 at 12:25 am

      Rebecca, thanks for your post!
      To respond in brief:

      1. When I write “technically female,” a better word choice would have been “genetically female.” I like how Eden Atwood, who has AIS, says that when forced to check the box to identify her gender she checks “female.” Female is how she feels, so female she is. But she checks it “only because the box is there.”

      Here’s an interview with Eden Atwood:

      http://abcnews.go.com/Health/MedicalMysteries/Story?id=5465752&page=1

      2. I’m not saying AIS invalidates evolutionary theory. I just enjoy the irony that women with AIS have features (curves, good skin, etc.) that men find attractive because those features suggest high fertility. The same applies to beautiful trans women!

      • sherrie davis said, on June 9, 2009 at 11:18 am

        Jenna,

        Being of mother of 4 beautiful, highly diverse girls, i am delighted to hit upon your blog and will read your books. I am constantly looking to at least glean from the groves of “science geeks.” Having one amazon willowy girl with problem ovaries and other signs of hormone aberrancy, i am constantly seeking to understand and be of assistance to her in her life. Human sexuality is an enigma so much more so when not viewed thru the lense of modern science/bio-facts.

        Thanks for sharing your remarkable acumen, inspired wit and style and not keeping a wonderful talent for transposing technical knowledge into public information to your self!! You are an asset to this we call life and you must have a very proud mama I have a very bright writer for a daughter. I hope she will be as great a contributer to her generation and hungry minds/souls as you are. (not intended as fluff just thought i should share that you are blessing beyond the monetary) I look forward to reading more of your blog as i follow it, as well as your books. Hopefully you will post when you are going to be a guest speaker on some media fronts. i can set the DVR : )
        Blessings,
        Sherrie

        • jenapincott said, on June 9, 2009 at 6:49 pm

          Sherrie,

          Thank you so much for your kind words. They made my day!

          Jena

  10. Alexander said, on June 2, 2009 at 3:52 am

    I like you blog very much! Always good and interesting reading. I have started a blog about Italy since I live there and it would be a pleasure to have a visit from you guys. I am sure there is something for everybody on the blog.

  11. Anonymously Secret said, on June 2, 2009 at 4:35 am

    Thanks for sharing… It was really interesting and somehow I feel sorry for those with AIS.

  12. mystiquemayhem said, on June 2, 2009 at 8:30 am

    Very very interesting post! Good read, thanks :)

  13. lollygabber said, on June 2, 2009 at 11:59 am

    Is the above image of the actual AIS woman referenced in the post? Or is it included as an example of what “she” might look like? Just curious.

    Thanks for sharing this interesting read.

  14. Stefan Aichholzer said, on June 2, 2009 at 5:43 pm

    Nice post, excellent reading!

  15. xia said, on June 2, 2009 at 6:50 pm

    After all this reading, why exactly is femininity more than breeding? Because this ‘male’ looks like a woman? So what looks is what is? Seems to me the DNA tells it all. Then, she feels she is a woman, so who am I argue?
    I want to make clear that I have no prejudice of any kind in this matter but feel a lot of these issues are gender bent the other way to make those who have this feel more human/male/female. You are human, the first of all awareness and there’s more between heaven and earth than we know, there’s probably a lot more between males and females. Stop worrying about genders, only in the breeding department does that matter. We all have our cross to bear.

    • jenapincott said, on June 3, 2009 at 12:28 am

      Xia, I agree that we should all transcend gender. As for discussion about femininity, see response to Rebecca’s post above.

  16. aNONymous said, on June 2, 2009 at 10:09 pm

    wow…this made me see hermaphrodites in a whole new light.

  17. Rebecca said, on June 3, 2009 at 12:55 am

    Thanks for the response, Jena! I completely agree with your thoughts on femininity. (Interesting link, too!)

  18. ian in hamburg said, on June 3, 2009 at 6:46 am

    Ann Coulter! Let’s leave non-humans out of the equation, shall we?

  19. Cat said, on September 23, 2009 at 11:50 am

    If anyone wonders why someone with AIS would feel shame and fear rejection you need only to see the comments posted here. While most are honestly respectful and recognize this is a subject and experience most know nothing about, there are always those who are insensitive and judgmental about anyone that is different. Referring to someone as “hermaphrodite” is insulting, insensitive and factually incorrect. Referring to someone with AIS as “male” in any way other than discussing their XY chromosomes is insulting and insensitive. It’s just as insulting to refer to an AIS woman as “she” in quotes. And how, exactly, is this “scary”? And what was the point of that video posting?

    The media is often wrong when dealing with conditions like AIS (and Swyer’s Syndrome, a similar condition where a phenotypical female is later found to be genetically male and has a female reproductive system with undeveloped gonads). In that episode of House, they refer to the AIS patient as “he” after diagnosis is made. Also insulting and insensitive. (see the Intersex Society of North America’s response here: http://www.isna.org/node/1008). ER also had an AIS patient storyline that was sensationalistic, insensitive and insulting.

    Let’s face it, gender and sexuality discussions make us uncomfortable. For some people the easiest thing to do is shut down, build walls of difference or retreat to a place of immaturity and perceived superiority.

    I am a woman with Swyer’s Syndrome, a diagnosis that took me years to uncover due to it’s rare nature and the lack of both knowledge and comfort about intersex conditions. I have never felt anything but female, and my XY chromosomes don’t change that at all. I respect people who want to better understand the world’s diversity, but it must be done with sensitivity and respect. Don’t talk to me about God and his plan. Don’t tell me I am lucky to never have had a period or breakouts. Don’t refer to me as “she” or “male”. Don’t keep spreading rumors about famous women who may have AIS or a related condition. Don’t compare me to transsexuals or other gender dysmorphic disorders or cross-dressers or homosexuals.

    The gender diaspora is far more diverse and shaded than you can imagine, but the shades of gray are not interchangeable. To understand is to leave judgement out of it and keep an open mind about the many shades of gray that are presented in nature. It is what it is and it’s always been that way. We are just now starting to understand the diversity and develop language to explain it.


Leave a Reply