Science of Love, Sex, and Babies

Are sexually motivated men responsible for the recession?

Posted in news by jenapincott on December 9, 2008

babeinpileofmoneyenhancedOne theme I discuss in BLONDES is that male economic resources are related to reproductive success. Consumption — of cars, clothes, vacation houses, horses, holidays, bling — is how guys show off their economic power, and in past years consumption in the U.S. has skyrocketed. So, incidentally, has the infidelity rate among both men and women.
According to a new study by Daniel Kruger a the University of Michigan, men with strong “mating intentions” do indeed spend more and save less than their less sexually motivated peers. Kruger and his colleagues conducted a random telephone survey, asking men to report their expenditures and sexual histories. Indeed, regardless of age, marital status, and education, guys who spent more than they saved — and who spent more than they earned (thanks to cheap and easy credit) — reported having more sexual partners and a desire for higher numbers of sexual partners than their more monogamous peers. The 25 percent of men who were fiscally conservative had an average of three sexual partners in the past five years, and only desired one partner in the next five years. The guys with the highest levels of conspicuous consumption doubled those figures.
The dirty little secret is that our economy runs on the male impulse, honed by thousands of years of evolution, to spend as a way to show status, which is in turn related to reproductive success. Imagine — what would happen to global markets if women were deliberately disinterested in the goods men have to offer?

Here’s a theory: did cheap and easy credit make it easier for men to attract more women than they would otherwise? Did low interest rates, easy mortgages, and generous credit lines inadvertently increase the divorce rate — or aid and abet infidelity? If so, could a recession actually mean more monogamy?

Comments welcome.

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Seymour Totti said, on December 9, 2008 at 9:31 am

    All those man accessories are just peacock feathers designed to attract the attention of women. It’s far more efficient just to pay for sex.

  2. Painting Tasters said, on December 12, 2008 at 8:13 am

    It’s the desire for more! and more! and more! that leads corporate leaders to do selfish and irresponsible things. Why stop at 20 million when you can trick people into giving you 200 million? Why have a wife when you can have sex with a different woman every night?

    Sex is one of the perks of money and power. Collect enough money and just about anyone can get sex on a regular basis (it might not be “good” sex though). It’s a huge motivation for men but not the only one.

  3. Ducker said, on January 8, 2009 at 9:41 pm

    I agree, recession will boost monogamy due the fact that there is less money to party with therefore no parties no sex…..therefore one will look for a steady relationship to try and save a bit of cash…

  4. Hi, interesting post. I have been thinking about this issue,so thanks for posting. I will likely be coming back to your posts. Keep up great writing

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: